The Moderating Role of Firm Size on the Relationship between Professional Ethics and Audit Quality: An Empirical Study of Big Four and Non-Big Four Public Accounting Firms

Authors

  • Rina Septiyani
  • Angella Natalia Susanty universitas bandar lampung

Keywords:

Professional Ethics, Audit Quality, Public Accounting Firm Size

Abstract

This study aims to provide empirical evidence of the influence of professional ethics on the quality of audits, specifically examining how this relationship is influenced by the size of the public accounting company. The study focuses on the impact of Professional Ethics, as the sole independent variable, on audit quality in both Big Four and Non-Big Four Public Accounting Firms in 2017. The population being examined consists of Public Accounting Firms, including both those designated as Big Four and those designated as Non-Big Four. By employing purposive sampling, a total of 115 questionnaires were obtained, and 113 of these were successfully disseminated to the intended participants. The chosen data analysis method is Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), specifically utilising the Partial Least Square (PLS) methodology. The study's findings provide strong evidence that professional ethics have a beneficial impact on the quality of audits. Furthermore, the analysis of the moderating impact of the size of public accounting firms demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in the correlation between professional ethics and audit quality. These findings emphasise the complex interactions within the field of auditing, emphasising the subtle influence of professional ethics and the size of the firm on the outcomes of audit quality. This study provides significant findings about professional ethics and audit quality in the setting of public accounting firms. The study enhances our understanding of the various elements that influence audit quality results by examining how company size affects these outcomes. This knowledge may be applied to both theoretical frameworks and practical implementations in the auditing profession.

References

Abbot, L. J., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Internal Audit Quality and Financial Reporting Quality: The Joint Importance of Independence and Competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12099

Abu-Nassar, M., & Rutherford, B. A. (1996). External Users of Financial Reports in Less Developed Countries: the Case of Jordan. The British Accounting Review, 28(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1996.0004

Adams, M. B. (1994). Agency Theory and the Internal Audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909410071133

Albaum, G. (1997). The Likert Scale Revisited. Market Research Society. Journal., 39(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539703900202

Apostolou, B., & Thibadoux, G. M. (2003). Why Integrity Matters: Accounting for the Accountants. Public Integrity, 5(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15580989.2003.11770948

Benston, G. J., & Hartgraves, A. L. (2002). Enron: what happened and what we can learn from it. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00042-X

Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322

Chan, P., Ezzamel, M., & Gwilliam, D. (1993). Determinants of Audit Fees Quoted UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20(6), 765–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00292.x

Chin, W. W., Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679160402

Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., Omer, T. C., & Shelley, M. K. (2016). Understanding Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Professionals and Investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1648–1684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259223

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2), 275–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Covaleski, M. A. (1997). Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of control in the Big Six. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00005-0

Doloi, H., Iyer, K. C., & Sawhney, A. (2011). Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor’s performance on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 687–695. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007

Fan, J. P. H., & Wong, T. J. (2005). Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00162.x

Felix William L., Jr., Gramling, A. A., & Maletta, M. j. (2001). The Contribution of Internal Audit as a Determinant of External Audit Fees and Factors Influencing This Contribution. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 513–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00026

Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003

Gul, F. A., Lynn, S. G., & Tsui, J. S. L. (2002). Audit Quality, Management Ownership, and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0201700102

Hiebl, M. R. W. (2015). Agency and stewardship attitudes of chief financial officers in private companies. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-12-2012-0032

Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975

Kueppers, R. J., & Sullivan, K. B. (2010). How and why an independent audit matters. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(4), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2010.22

Lehrer, M., & Segal, L. (2020). The stewardship organization: essential characteristics and conditions of feasibility. American Journal of Business, 35(3/4), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-04-2020-0046

Mironeasa, C., & Codină, G. G. (2013). A new approach of audit functions and principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 27–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.018

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2004). Cost–quality conflict in audit firms: an empirical investigation. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000216794

Preston, L. E., & Sapienza, H. J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90023-Z

Richard Baker, C., & Owsen, D. M. (2002). Increasing the role of auditing in corporate governance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5), 783–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2002.0566

Rusmanto, T., & Waworuntu, S. R. (2015). Factors Influencing Audit Fee in Indonesian Publicly Listed Companies Applying GCG. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 63–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.336

Sabet, P. G. P., & Zhang, G. Q. (2015). Methodology. In P. G. P. Sabet & G. Q. Zhang (Eds.), Communicating through Vague Language: A Comparative Study of L1 and L2 Speakers (pp. 33–46). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137486387_3

Sarwoko, I., & Agoes, S. (2014). An Empirical Analysis of Auditor’s Industry Specialization, Auditor’s Independence and Audit Procedures on Audit Quality: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 271–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.077

Sohn, S. Y., Kim, H. S., & Moon, T. H. (2007). Predicting the financial performance index of technology fund for SME using structural equation model. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 890–898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.036

Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the Conceptual Terrain. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 603–626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00251

Tillema, S., & ter Bogt, H. J. (2016). Does an Agency-Type of Audit Model Fit a Stewardship Context? Evidence from Performance Auditing in Dutch Municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12084

Ward, D., & Filatotchev, I. (2010). Principal–principal–agency relationships and the role of external governance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 31(4), 249–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1473

Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345

Zumitzavan, V., & Michie, J. (2015). Research Methodology. In V. Zumitzavan & J. Michie (Eds.), Personal Knowledge Management, Leadership Styles, and Organisational Performance: A Case Study of the Healthcare Industry in Thailand (pp. 27–34). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-438-2_3

Downloads

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Rina Septiyani, & Angella Natalia Susanty. (2024). The Moderating Role of Firm Size on the Relationship between Professional Ethics and Audit Quality: An Empirical Study of Big Four and Non-Big Four Public Accounting Firms. Proceeding ICEBFG, 3(1). Retrieved from https://proceedingconference.ubl.ac.id/index.php/icebfg/article/view/34