Exploring Green Sukuk as a Sustainable Financing Option for Renewable Energy in Turkey

Authors

  • Tri Damayanti

Keywords:

Zero Carbon Emission, Turkiye Energy Self-Sufficiency, Green Sukuk

Abstract

Securing energy resources is paramount for the sustenance and development of societies worldwide, necessitating a collective agreement on their judicious utilization to safeguard both present and future generations. Moreover, the utilization of energy must not exacerbate environmental degradation, as pollution disrupts ecological equilibrium, alters climate patterns, and imperils renewable energy sources. The Paris Agreement underscores the commitment of participating nations to foster environmental health and safeguard natural energy reservoirs through sustainable practices. Each signatory nation is tasked with endeavors aimed at preserving climatic equilibrium and ecological integrity, underscoring the significance of this global pact. A core objective of the Paris Agreement involves transitioning towards renewable energy sources while conserving non-renewable counterparts. This transition necessitates substantial investments, particularly pertinent for energy-importing nations like Turkiye, beset by myriad challenges in sourcing non-renewable energy. Turkiye's energy importation faces hurdles such as pricing dynamics, supply constraints, distribution complexities, and geopolitical intricacies with energy-exporting nations. This paper advocates for the adoption of financial instruments to bolster renewable energy generation, thereby meeting domestic energy demands and achieving national energy self-sufficiency. Specifically, it advocates for the utilization of green sukuk, financial instruments akin to bonds but devoid of interest-based returns, making them impervious to interest rate fluctuations. Employing qualitative methodologies, this study draws insights from secondary data sources and authoritative institutional findings. Focusing on Turkiye's energy investment needs through 2050, this paper explores the potential of green sukuk instruments to raise investment capital. It presents illustrative calculations to elucidate the benefits of deploying green sukuk instruments for securing investment funds and attracting potential investors. Green sukuk products, owing to their independence from interest rate fluctuations, offer both competitiveness and security. Their positive impact on Turkiye lies in their capacity to support energy requirements, preempting potential energy crises. With energy independence and resilience against energy crises, Turkiye's populace can pursue their daily lives and economic activities unhindered.

References

Aguilar, F. X., & Cai, Z. (2010). Exploratory analysis of prospects for renewable energy private investment in the U.S. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.05.012

Apak, S., Atay, E., & Tuncer, G. (2012). New Innovative Activities in Renewable Energy Technologies and Environmental Policy: Evidence from an Eu Candidate Country. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 493–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1026

Arent, D. J., Wise, A., & Gelman, R. (2011). The status and prospects of renewable energy for combating global warming. Energy Economics, 33(4), 584–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.11.003

Bilgen, S., Keleş, S., Kaygusuz, A., Sarı, A., & Kaygusuz, K. (2008). Global warming and renewable energy sources for sustainable development: A case study in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(2), 372–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.016

Bulut, U., & Muratoglu, G. (2018). Renewable energy in Turkey: Great potential, low but increasing utilization, and an empirical analysis on renewable energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy, 123, 240–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.057

Climate Bonds Initiative. (2013). Green Sukuk. https://www.climatebonds.net/projects/facilitation/green-sukuk

Demirbas, A. (2009). Global Renewable Energy Projections. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 4(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240701620499

Elie, L., Granier, C., & Rigot, S. (2021). The different types of renewable energy finance: A Bibliometric analysis. Energy Economics, 93, 104997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104997

Ellabban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014). Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 748–764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113

Fang, K., Zhou, Y., Wang, S., Ye, R., & Guo, S. (2018). Assessing national renewable energy competitiveness of the G20: A revised Porter’s Diamond Model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 719–731. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.011

Hussain, A., Arif, S. M., & Aslam, M. (2017). Emerging renewable and sustainable energy technologies: State of the art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 12–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.033

Karagoz, S., & Bakirci, K. (2009). Sustainable Energy Development in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802053343

Kaya, D. (2006). Renewable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.08.001

Kaygusuz, K., & Sari, A. (2006). The Benefits of Renewables in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/009083190881463

Keleş, S., & Bilgen, S. (2012). Renewable energy sources in Turkey for climate change mitigation and energy sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 5199–5206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.026

Khalid, A., Malik, G. F., & Mahmood, K. (2021). Sustainable development challenges in libraries: A systematic literature review (2000–2020). The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 102347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102347

Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 583–594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2159

Kılıç, M., & Özdemir, E. (2018). Long-term Energy Demand and Supply Projections and Evaluations for Turkey. In I. Dincer, C. O. Colpan, & O. Kizilkan (Eds.), Exergetic, Energetic and Environmental Dimensions (pp. 115–132). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813734-5.00007-X

Kok, M. V. (2015). Renewable Energy Sources: Current Perspectıves and Future Prospects ın Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2014.947447

Krewitt, W., Teske, S., Simon, S., Pregger, T., Graus, W., Blomen, E., Schmid, S., & Schäfer, O. (2009). Energy [R]evolution 2008—a sustainable world energy perspective. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5764–5775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.042

Lam, P. T. I., & Law, A. O. K. (2018). Financing for renewable energy projects: A decision guide by developmental stages with case studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 937–944. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.083

Owusu, P. A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering, 3(1), 1167990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990

Ozcan, M. (2021). Renewable energy auctions in Turkey: Auction design based on stakeholder opinions. Renewable Energy, 169, 473–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.009

Ozgur, M. A. (2008). Review of Turkey’s renewable energy potential. Renewable Energy, 33(11), 2345–2356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.02.003

Pak, B. K., Albayrak, Y. E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2015). Renewable Energy Perspective for Turkey Using Sustainability Indicators. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2015.8.1.15

Purnomo, A., Sari, A. K., Susanti, T., Mannan, S. S. A., & Lumentut, T. M. B. A. (2021). Sustainable finance study of bibliometric overview. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012124

Rahman, M., Isa, C. R., Tu, T.-T., Sarker, M., & Masud, Md. A. K. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of socially responsible investment sukuk literature. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-020-00035-2

Resch, G., Held, A., Faber, T., Panzer, C., Toro, F., & Haas, R. (2008). Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4048–4056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029

Rumyantseva, A., Zhutyaeva, S., & Lazareva, N. (2019). Promotion of investment in renewable energy projects. Topical Problems of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environmental Economics (TPACEE 2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019910

Şekercioğlu, S., & Yılmaz, M. (2012). Renewable energy perspectives in the frame of Turkey’s and the EU’s energy policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 63, 233–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.01.039

Tan, S. O., Toku, T., & Türker, I. (2016). The Analysis of Renewable Energy Researches in Turkey. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 161(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/161/1/012077

Toklu, E. (2013). Overview of potential and utilization of renewable energy sources in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 50, 456–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.035

Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2020). Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: Do climate commitments matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120051

Tu, C. A., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Sarker, T. (2020). Investigating solutions for the development of a green bond market: Evidence from analytic hierarchy process. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101457

Ünüvar, B. (2019). Financing the green economy. In S. Acar & E. Yeldan (Eds.), Handbook of Green Economics (pp. 163–181). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816635-2.00010-9

Downloads

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Tri Damayanti. (2024). Exploring Green Sukuk as a Sustainable Financing Option for Renewable Energy in Turkey. Proceeding ICEBFG, 3(1). Retrieved from http://proceedingconference.ubl.ac.id/index.php/icebfg/article/view/37